New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that would enable several casino that is new to be built through the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question that he claims violates state legislation.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum carries a number of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For example, the question mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.

But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. According to a lawsuit filed within the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has had up issues with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised advantages of casino expansion. Leia mais